David Kastrup wrote: - I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar checks that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout.
Thanks for testing it, David. What options did you use for midi2ly and lilypond? My command lines were: ./midi2ly.py -o meter.ly -n -V 1 meter.midi lilypond meter.ly I only got one bar check complaint when LP processed meter.ly which contains: TrackA = { \numericTimeSignature\time 4/4 c'4 d'4 e'4 f'4 | % orig \numericTimeSignature\time 2/4 g'8 a'8 g'8 g'8 a'8 g'8 c''4 | % orig \numericTimeSignature\time 6/8 c''4 g'8 a'8 g'8 g'8 a'8 g'8 | % orig \numericTimeSignature\time 2/4 c''4 c''4 r2 | % orig } It was on the 6/8 line in the above which contains 8 eighth-notes. I'll try upgrading to 2.21 and see if that makes any difference. On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 5:15 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Michael Ellis <michael.f.el...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi, It's been a few years since my last post here. I'm wondering about > the status of > > midi2ly. I just tried the version that came with 2.18.2 and it seems to > handle meter > > changes incorrectly. Here's a short example produced from a midi file > imported into > > MuseScore 2.1 > > > > msc2-meter-example.png > > > > and here's the result of processing what midi2ly produced from the same > file > > > > ly-meter-example.png > > > > The MuseScore output is correct and matches the tempo and meter items > > embedded in the original midi file (attached). I've also verified with > 2 different > > DAW's (Reaper and Logic X) that the midi file is imported correctly. > > > > The application that produced the midi file is called tbon. It's a > shorthand notation > > language I wrote for projects where fast notation entry is more > important than > > having the full capabilities of LilyPond. If you're curious about tbon, > go to > > https://github.com/Michael-F-Ellis/tbon . The README has a link to a > live online > > demo. > > > > I'd really rather use LP than MuseScore for the times when I want to > engrave the > > output from tbon since LP still produces better looking scores, imo, but > not being > > able to handle meter changes is a showstopper. > > I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar checks > that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout. > > -- > David Kastrup > -- Write music faster with Tbon. <https://github.com/Michael-F-Ellis/tbon/#tbon>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user