Hmmm... I made the change to use the stencil extent and that seems to be
fine. I am not sure what you are saying about the visibility of the
final stencil.
As for linebreaking. That is indeed a showstopper at the moment. Is that
because you are using filled box stencil? When I was using a path
directive with a line, the breaking seemed to work / break fine. I will
see if I can make the switch unless you have another idea.
Best,
Michael
On 01/31/2018 03:41 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-01-31 3:46 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter <mwin...@unboundedpress.org>:
On first glance. This looks ideal. THANK YOU
I am a bit brain dead at the moment, so will dig in tomorrow and let you
know if I have any further questions / thoughts / ideas.
Glad you like it.
I've found a weakness, though: the stencils overlap. Visible, if you
apply box-stencil to the final stencil.
Probably one should go for stencil-extent to get the extension in
X-axis and not for 'X from left/right-bound-info.
Will have a look in the evening.
Also, linebreaks are not yet working.
Cheers,
Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
