Urs Liska-3 wrote > I can't comment on the implementation, but IMHO it looks fine.
Thanks, that's all I wanted to know here on the user list. The actual implementation isn't perfectly complete anyway (and I'll have to do a lot of testing because note names and accidentals are terribly basic stuff...) Abraham has just sent a reply regarding the glyph double-flat (and, consequently, new triple-flat) appearance, it starts getting interesting... :) Urs Liska-3 wrote > Why is that so? From the actual height on the page there shouldn't be an > issue having it below the dot. Is there a padding or an Y-extent that > disturbes? Just about 3 seconds after pressing the "Post Message" button I asked myself the same question. Optically, it shouldn't be a problem to shove the #x under the dot, the vertical dimensions are according to the # standard, hmmm... I'll have a closer look at this (probably tomorrow, at the moment I've just messed up something and can't compile the documentation anymore...). All the best, Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
