In my opinion, Lilypond is excellent for writing sheet music, but not very good for composing. I usually use MuseScore or Qtractor for composing, then (manually) convert it to Lilypond to make sheet music.
On 03/22/18 16:35, Jonas Daverio wrote: > That may seem like a stupid question, but I've been using LilyPond with > Frescobaldi for a year and a half, but I start to ask myself if it is as > efficient as if I had used another tool like Musescore. > > I explain: I don't have at all a powerful computer, and I think that an > essential feature that I have to have to compose efficiently is to see what > I've written in real-time. There is such a feature in Frescobaldi name > "continuous engraving" (or something like that, my version is not in > English), but on my slow computer and with a big project such as a 20-pages > quartet or symphony, it takes at least 40 to 50 seconds to render. > > In addition, it would be great to hear the music out of the midi file by > clicking on the preview (like on almost every WYSIWYG music software) but > Frescobaldi's midi player is pretty useless for that. > > I'm not saying that LilyPond and Frescobaldi are bad, it's probably just me > who don't know the right tools or the right way to use them. I'm asking to > find a way to make my workflow more convenient to compose. > > Do you have any suggestions? > > Thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
