On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > > I've set up two PDFs for comparing the original and my current > > working draft design (the triple flat missing in the original > > design, though). All existing accidentals containing flats both on > > and between stave-lines in all design sizes. In my printout, the > > opening-up of counters does not look overdone. > > > > issue3356-flats-ORIGINAL.pdf > > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t3887/ > issue3356-flats-ORIGINAL.pdf> > > issue3356-flats-NEW.pdf > > <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t3887/ > issue3356-flats-NEW.pdf> > > Very nice! Two remarks. > > * For smaller sizes I would like the slash through the double flat > become asymmetric as an optical counter: the right-hand part should > become more extended horizontally. > > * The same should probably be applied to other slashes also, but to a > lesser extent (and maybe extending on the left-hand side). > I agree with Werner on all three statements. They look much much better now. Thanks for your work on this, Torsten! Best, Abraham
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
