Thank you, I got it. (I would have replied to the list, but the only button
that appeared on the page was to reply directly to you, and I only get
digests, which are hard to reply to.)
You are right it does work correctly. My fault.
Larry M.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:19 AM Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Dear Larry,
>
> please always reply to the list.
>
> Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Larry Morandi:
> > Thanks for your reply. You say that using tags works, but it doesn’t for
> me using the current stable release, 2.18.2. The output look exactly the
> same whether I use tags for not. Are you using 2.19.something?
> >
> > Larry M.
> >
>
> This works both for 2.19.80 and 2.18.2. Here is the full code again
> which I compiled with 2.18.2:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \header {
> title = "Test showing extraneous TabStaff output"
> }
> global = {
> \time 4/4
> \key c \major
> \tempo 4=100
> }
> chordNames = \chordmode {
> \global
> c1
> }
> melody = \relative c'' {
> \global
> c4 d
> \tag tab \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #0
> e f
> }
> \score {
> <<
> \new ChordNames \chordNames
> \new FretBoards \chordNames
> \new Staff { \removeWithTag tab \melody }
> >>
> \layout { }
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Joram
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
