David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > Torsten Hämmerle <torsten.haemme...@web.de> writes: > >> Thomas Morley-2 wrote >>> Hmm, there's still some horizontal difference. >> >> Hi Harm, >> >> The idea of adding 'pt was brilliant, because it lead me into the right >> direction: >> >> *The exact reason...* >> ... is the co-operation between the (outside) Pango world and the (inside) >> TeX-like world: >> An American (Pango) point is 1/72 inch, a TeX point used internally is >> 1/72.27 inch - that's all! >> This tiny deviation leads to an enormous mismatch between glyph and font >> metrics scaling. > > Uh, that's 0.4% or so. How does an "enormous mismatch" come about then?
I think it's more likely that LilyPond messes up when reusing fonts with a particular size under different circumstances and your "correction" just keeps it from reusing a font, instead calculating a fresh one. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
