Sven Axelsson <sven.axels...@gmail.com> writes: > On 22 May 2018 at 20:06, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Ok, this is _too_ much of a temptation. So little to fill in >> actually... >> >> Now it would be even nicer to be able to write >> >> c'1*#(ly:music-length musicwithdrone) >> >> and there is actually no compelling reason not to allow this I think. >> I'll take a look to see what would be involved adding to the parser >> here. >> >> This really beats "LilyPond programmers are lazy jerks" solution-finding >> approaches. >> > > That would be absolutely brilliant, David! If you do it I will start > promoting the "Lilypond programmers are hard-working saints" meme. ☺
Turns out that I don't have a good idea where to document this in the manuals. At least I added a (half-stolen) regtest that at least illustrates how this can be used for your usage case. Current branch: issue5327 Tracker issue: 5327 (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5327/) Rietveld issue: 346810043 (https://codereview.appspot.com/346810043) Issue description: Allow Scheme/identifiers for duration multipliers Also contains commit: Regtest for computed duration multipliers -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user