"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> > To: "Simon Albrecht" <simon.albre...@mail.de>; "Shachar Shemesh" > <shac...@shemesh.biz>; <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 4:52 PM > Subject: Re: Ties across voices > > >> >> >> On 6/17/18, 12:14 PM, "Simon Albrecht" <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: >> >> On 16.06.2018 20:41, Shachar Shemesh wrote: >> > The Tie won't tie between the voices and the chord past the voices. >> >> It seems to work if you move the Tie_engraver from Voice to Staff >> level: >> >> I moved Tie_performer along, since you were talking about the >> importance >> of accurate MIDI for your use case. I don’t use MIDI (or hardly >> ever) so >> I can’t test reasonably, but it should work, I imagine. >> >> This looks like the right answer, and one that maybe ought to be >> documented in a docs snippet. Lots of people use the LSR trick of >> hidden notes, when a more straightforward approach is to move the >> Tie_engraver. >> >> I wonder if having the Tie_engraver be in the Staff ought to be the >> default? Can anyone see negatives to having it be in the Staff? > > If it means ties will tie equal pitch notes in, say, voiceOne with > others in voiceTwo, both on the same stave, it seems like an excellent > change.
tieWaitForNote would work worse in several situations. So would other things like a choir unison note held over a bar. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
