On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:12 PM David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good grief :(   I selected the MIT license because it's very common,
> and in the spirit of, as you write, "feel
> free to use it, I don't care."
>
> Seems I'm not the only one--I read this in the openlilylib repo
> (https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/LICENSE):
>
> "Since most of the snippets are separate entities,
> they can be licensed individially.
> There are no official rules on licensing (yet);
> We suggest that unless otherwise specified
> everything should be licensed under the MIT license
> as found at http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
> Any content of this repository that isn't explicitly
> licensed is implicitly licensed under the rules of
> this MIT license."
>
> Best,
> David N

And LilyBin: https://github.com/LilyBin/LilyBin/blob/master/LICENSE

DN

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to