Hello, I use VerticalAxisGroup.remove-layer as described in input/regression/divisi-staves.ly
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/input/regression/a6/lily-436997bb.ly See more info on the bug tracker of issue 3518. https://code.google.com/archive/p/lilypond/issues/3518 Works very well but unfortunately not documented in the Notation Reference manual it seems. Cheers, Xavier On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 03:07, Reggie <reegist...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For those of you who engrave orchestral music in which the strings often have > your typical divisi a2 or a3 > > Suppose a performance is coming up and you need to print parts from the full > score. > > So when you go to engrave the individual parts for any of the strings for > example, (say Violin I), would you: > > a) always leave the Violin I "as is" and just \new Staff the violin variable > as it appears in the full score regardless of divisi complexity / > independence > --*(Violin I all on one staff for part) > b) only leave the Violin I as is from the full score if it's a simple score > and not that complicated of a separate part > --*(Violin I all on one staff for part, but only if it's not too complex of > a division rhythm-wise and for not that many measures in the score) > c) always input all divisi as separate variables from the beginning and > actually partcombine the divisi of the same instrument, so as to have > multiple staves if need be on the part version. > --*(Violin I from the start of engraving has already been pre-variabled into > 2/3 divisi with a ton of spacer rests throughout the whole part until the > sections needed, then input the divisi notes, then go back to normal, etc - > at the end, use partcombine on the part, etc.) > > How do you approach printing string parts for a modern orchestral piece, > regarding divisi? Does it depend or is your approach constant? > Most of the music I am engraving has divisi similar to that of the 19th > century, where it's not too separate of a part difference but some upcoming > projects I will be working on have rather diverse divisi spreads within the > same string part. > So I wanted to begin the project 'correctly' before getting too deep in and > realizing I couldn't do parts easily. You can't really [easily] do a > partcombine with just one variable taht has temporary voices on it. > > Thanks > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
