Am Mo., 17. Dez. 2018 um 21:20 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
> > The idea: > > > > #(define-markup-command (wordwrap-field layout props symbol) > > (symbol?) [doc-string dropped] > > (let* ((m (chain-assoc-get symbol props))) > > (cond ((string? m) > > (wordwrap-string-markup layout props m)) > > ((markup-list? m) > > (wordwrap-markup layout props m)) > > ((markup? m) > > (interpret-markup layout props m)) > > (else empty-stencil)))) > BTW, I am not convinced of the string/markup differentiation since a > string _is_ a simple markup. This is sort of icky. Well, work on this one is not finished ... Though, every string is a simple markup, yes, thus it's checked first. Why do you think it's icky? Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
