Gack McShite <tad.add...@gmail.com> writes: > I will stipulate that the version for the file was not necessarily a > match for the syntax. It was 2.14.0, your example was 2.12.0.
Just because I did not remember when the change happened and did not bother looking it up. Aaron checked and it was somewhere in the 2.15 line. > Not my generator, so I don't know how that version was chosen other > than current at the time. Obviously had I known that the syntax > changed from 2.12, I wouldn't be here annoying you fine folks. Sigh. It worked before, it didn't work afterwards, failing with syntax errors. Concluding from this that the syntax didn't change would not be my first thought. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user