Hi, David! On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 8:38 AM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Abraham Lee <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi, Chad! > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:19 AM Chad Linsley <cli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I’m by no means a seasoned Lilypond pro but I’ve been exploring how the > >> program handles beams. In the essay, the 1950 Barenreiter Bach cello > suite > >> edition is held up as a benchmark of high quality engraving. Seeing this > >> really helps the user understand why Lilypond’s default slurs are shaped > >> the way they are (not overly curvaceous). However, when I entered the > first > >> few systems, the beaming was much steeper than in the Barenreiter. It > only > >> started looking closer to it when I put a blank measure on the end > (three > >> measures to system = tighter spacing). I then tried the various tweaking > >> parameters for beams which worked fine on a beam-to-beam basis. What I’m > >> curious about is whether or not Lilypond can be set to produce beaming > >> closer to the Barenreiter without quite as much intervention. For > example, > >> the damping factor didn’t respond very sensitively when I tried using > >> decimal points. > >> > >> Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks! > >> > > > > Here's my first page of this piece. > > I'd have been interested in the second one, the multi-string passages > close to the end. Since there are fingerings in your page, you are > obviously not writing an Urtext. > Most definitely not. I am also not a string player, so you'll have to forgive the fingering. I was merely copying this from another source as an exercise. Anyway, see the attached PDF which includes both pages. Hopefully that satisfies your interests. Best, Abraham
suite1-in-G-Major-bwv1007-Prelude.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
