Evan Driscoll <eva...@gmail.com> writes:
> The difference between << {...} // {...} >> and chords I get -- but what
> about << {...} {...} >> *without* the //, for example in the first three
> lines of my snippet? Those seem to work the same as collating the
> corresponding notes in chords.
They are pretty much equivalent except when using articulations on
non-chord notes that have an event listener (like the Fingering_engraver
for fingerings). Those are sent to the event listener when using
simultaneous music but are engraved using the New_fingering_engraver
when they are written in-chord. If there is no event listener (like
usually for string numbers), they are left to deal with for the
New_fingering_engraver either way and there is no difference.
So there is a difference between the look of
<< c4-1 e-3 >>
and
<c-1 e-3>4
but not between
<< c4\1 e\3 >>
and
<c\1 e\3>4
Unless, of course, you add/remove engravers.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
