Beautiful. Thanks!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de>
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:23:48 +0200
> Subject: Re: Double clefs (or even triple)
>
>
> Am 19.10.19 um 14:56 schrieb Alexandre Ficagna:
> > Hi
> >
> > as Lilypond now have double G clefs with the \clef GG I'm wondering why
> > there's no \clef FF or even more like \clef GGG and \clef FFF for 15a
> > and 15b
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> I’ve never seen that, when are such clefs used?
>
> Cheers,
> Malte
>
> > Still, I tried this:
> > doubleF = {
> > \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
> > \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup { \combine \musicglyph #"clefs.F"
> > \translate #'(2 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.F" }
> > }
> >
> > But the ":" in the first F clef keep it away from an elegant solution.
> >
> > Any help?
>
> You could lay a white rectangle over the dots:
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> \version "2.19.83"
>
> doubleF = {
> \omit Staff.ClefModifier
> \override Staff.Clef.layer = -1
> \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
> \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup {
> \combine \combine
> \musicglyph #"clefs.F"
> \translate #'(2.2 . 0) \with-color #white \beam #0.5 #0 #1.5
> \translate #'(1.7 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.F"
> }
> }
>
> doubleG = {
> \omit Staff.ClefModifier
> \override Staff.Clef.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
> \override Staff.Clef.text = \markup {
> \combine \musicglyph #"clefs.G"
> \translate #'(1.5 . 0) \musicglyph #"clefs.G"
> }
> }
>
> \relative {
> \clef GG
> g1
> \clef "treble_8"
> \doubleG
> g
> \clef "bass_8"
> \doubleF
> f,
> }
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
