Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: > Hi David, > >> It's kind of embarrassing after that accolade that this particular >> solution (the \after function) is probably the least brilliant and >> involved of all. > > Sometimes, the most brilliant solutions are the most elegant ones. In > particular, your \after function was the first time I ever saw the > Bottom context directly addressed, and became aware of the power of > doing so.
It's just something included in the definition to avoid things behaving unexpectedly in some situations (like first thing in a StaffGroup or so). I don't think you'd see it outside of definitions. >> We probably should include it in LilyPond > > I think that’s a great idea. Noted. -- David Kastrup
