Thanks for looking into it. Indeed, I installed it using synaptic. Browsing in the ubuntu packages on: https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=focal&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=lilyglyphs.sty I don't find it either in 'focal', but I do find it in 'eoan'. https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=eoan&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=lilyglyphs.sty There I read it should be in the texlive-music package. Reading the description of 'texlive-music' in synaptic on my current system (20.04 or focal) lilyglyphs.sty is not mentioned either.
https://esmiltania.be On Twitter <https://twitter.com/Bart_Issimo> On Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/116379400376517483499/> Op do 2 jul. 2020 om 17:13 schreef Urs Liska <li...@openlilylib.org>: > Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: > > Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: > > > Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter < > > > bart.deruy...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi all, > > > > a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know > > > > something. > > > > I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a > > > > luatex > > > > file > > > > containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs. > > > > > > > > Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'. > > > > I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it > > > > has > > > > been > > > > removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't > > > > find > > > > anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository. > > > > > > Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will > > > investigate. > > > > How did you install LaTeX? I assume you are using TeX Live? The > > versions from the Ubuntu packages or the downloaded TeX Live? > > > > I assume you installed from the Ubuntu packages. If so, which actual > > packages did you install. > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/texlive-music/filelist > > indicates > > lilyglyphs is (still) in the texlive-music collection. > > > > Actually I'd be surprised if they had removed it. I'm aware of the > > possibility of compatibility issues, but I can't imagine they remove > > packages without warning/asking the maintainers first. > > I just had a closer look and found that > a) lilyglyphs.sty is (now?) placed at tex/lualatex/lilyglyphs > which is somewhat strange and might xelatex not find it (I'm not sure, > but if you use lyluatex this can't be the issue anyway. > > b) > I can't find lilyglyphs in the texlive package lists of Ubuntu and > Debian. I'll ask on the texlive mailing list. > > Urs > > > > > BestUrs > > > > > Urs > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Bart > > > > > > > > https://esmiltania.be > > > > On Twitter <https://twitter.com/Bart_Issimo> > > > > On Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/116379400376517483499/> > > > > > >
