Am Montag, den 13.07.2020, 19:02 +1000 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > Property subset is good. >
In a way, yes, namely by keeping within the semantic domain. However, while a property set actually defines the available properties (along with predicates and default values) the "preset" is concerned with *values* for a subset of the property set. After some thinking I disagree with the notion that preset is wrong in itself. The thing I'm referring to isn't a wrongly-worded mathematical set but a set of values to preset (in the ordinary English meaning of setting in advance) a subset of available properties. However, I agree that it would be unfortunate to have "set" in such different meanings in "property set" and "preset". > I also thought of 'selection' - a set of items selected from a larger > group. This has the same issue as the "property subset". What I implemented as \definePreset is not concerned with defining the subset as a set but with setting values to specific properties. Urs > > Andrew >