Hi! thank you! That looks awesome. But what do you do if you want to delete measure 227 entirely?
Cheers M ______________________________ http://www.marcoll.de subscribe to newsletter <http://eepurl.com/cKUzLX> > On 20 Nov 2020, at 17:39, J Martin Rushton <martinrushto...@btinternet.com> > wrote: > > Hi Max, > > Caveat: I've not used this personally, my scores are not complex enough. > > One of the standard ways of handling this is to use make > (https://www.gnu.org/software/make). Basically you write a makefile which > tells make which files to compile and use that as the input to Lilypond. > Make is clever though, and can select files on the basis of the last time > they were changed, or if given parameters (for instance to generate part > scores). > > See http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/usage/make-and-makefiles for > Lily's take on this. > > Regards, > Martin > > On 20/11/2020 16:03, Maximilian Marcoll wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> Over last last couple of days I have been thinking about possible ways to >> organize the engraving of a rather large piece (~45+ staves) in Lilypond. >> My problem is that the piece in question might undergo significant changes >> in the future, so I need access to both instrument-wise and measure-wise >> organisation simultaneously. >> I am considering to enter the entire music in a huge excel spreadsheet and >> to write a (python)-script to create one .ly file per voice, >> storing all the music in variables that can be used both in the full score >> and the individual parts. >> I’m having difficulties imagining that I am the first one to have this idea, >> but couldn’t find anything online. >> Any hints? >> Thanks a lot! >> Cheers, >> Max >> ______________________________ >> http://www.marcoll.de <http://www.marcoll.de> >> subscribe to newsletter <http://eepurl.com/cKUzLX> > > -- > J Martin Rushton MBCS >
