> It's ironic that \laissezVibrer follows on directly from \repeatTie > on page 57, but you might miss it if the name means nothing to you, > and the next illustration doesn't catch your eye.
In https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/751 I've added a paragraph at the beginning of the 'Ties' section that explains ties to and from nothing. > But I couldn't help noticing that, if you use the Contents rather than > the Index, the lengthy section § 1.4 Repeats now doesn't cover > ties at all, nor does it point back to Ties (which falls under > § 1.2 Rhythms unconnected with repeats). Well, it gets mentioned as... > There's an oblique reference to \repeatTie on page 161 under > Known issues and warnings. ... this. > Might this be preceded by a paragraph on the use of \laissezVibrer > and \repeatTie, with a pointer back to pp56–7? I don't think this is the right place – \laissezVibrer is not related to repeats at all. Werner