Would there be any mileage in "contributed" scripts being distributed with Lily. Making sure they work, are documented and compatible with the current version is the author's responsibility, but they would be distributed under the GPL, as is the rest of Lily. I suppose it would mean someone would have to be responsible for what was added, and, perhaps, removed.
/Bernard Erik Sandberg wrote: > Nice! I think something like this really could be useful for many users. > > Some questions: > - Do you have an example input file demonstrating most features (as a > tutorial)? > - The copyright line is (legally) unclear. Copyright laws are pretty nasty. > To > be on the safe side, I'd recommend you to look at FSF's recommendations, see > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html > (you should at least provide some kind of link to the actual license text). > > Otherwise there is a risk that the license is invalid. > > Erik > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
