On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 9:21 PM David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu 02 Dec 2021 at 09:05:08 (+0100), Thomas Scharkowski wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 2:41 AM Paolo Prete wrote: > > > > With my processor (Intel Celeron N3350) it took 96 seconds to compile > MSDN.ly > > > > > > But my CPU is listed with score 287: > > That too seems slow. What OS is it running? > > Thanks for noting this. I re-ran the tests, and I confirm that it took 96 secs on LilyPond 2.20.0-1 on Lubuntu (newest version). Same time without the X environment. However, with LilyPond 2.22.0-1 it took 55 seconds. This is a huge difference. Now, if I compare this last result with the Apple Mini of Jacques, I obtain 55 seconds versus 39 seconds. But the Gzip test shows 91 versus 40, then the Gzip test is not a reliable parameter too for our test. > > > > https://openbenchmarking.org/vs/Processor/Apple%20M1,Intel%20Celeron%20J3455 > > > > > > (note that it compares Apple M1 with Celeron J3455, which is NOT my > CPU, but it should be very similar for single-core tests.) > > > > > > The result is 91 / 40 which is very similar to 96 seconds / 40 seconds > (Jacque's test) . I don't know if this is a coincidence and please, if you > all have more data, share it. > > I can't get results from that site because only the > fastest machine above matches: there's nothing comparable > even to the middle one, and the slowest probably raises > some eyebrows. > Yeah, there are not many machines for the Gzip test. But did you check for a similar CPU on the big list? https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/compress-gzip Anyway, we have to fix some points before doing further tests: 1) which version of LilyPond should we use? I would propose 2.22.0 2) which test can we use, as a reference? Geekbench 5 has the disadvantage I said before, and Gzip doesn't seem to me the best one, give the discrepancy between 55/39 and 91/40 Cheers, Paolo > > Cheers, > David. >
