Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you build the ec-fonts-mftraced yourself? I would guess so, > since you have problems both with the feta fonts in LilyPond and > the ec-font used for the title.
You guessed wrong. ec-fonts-mftraced is from the Lilypond download site. > If you want to verify that a certain font file, say ecrm10.pfa, > looks OK, try the following steps: > Run: text testfont > ... > Name of the font to test = ecrm10 > Now type a test command (\help for help):) > *\table\bye > > Run: dvips -u+ec-mftrace testfont > (make sure that the printouts include <ecrm10.pfa> ) > > Look at the resulting file testfont.ps > > For the feta font, replace ecrm10 by feta20 and -u+ec-mftrace by > -u+lilypond It says <feta20.pfa> and the resulting PS looks perfect. Please consider that in the original report I mentioned the Postscript file being perfect (with vector fonts), it's only the PDF which exhibits the problem. -- Thanks, Feri. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
