On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 7:10 AM Jean Abou Samra <j...@abou-samra.fr> wrote: > ... > [Marc] > > It will be necessary to keep an uncolored version for men (in > > principle women do not have this problem) who do not see well certain > > colors. > > > This is taken care of -- the colors have been > chosen to have enough contrast to the white > background to be readable even for those > with impaired vision. Since I am not such a > person, I have been checking the scheme against > WCAG recommendations. The color with least > contrast has 6.15, which is quite a bit > above the WCAG AA level of 4.5. This means that > even someone not discerning colors at all > can read such highlighted code.
I am colorblind (which BTW means that it's hard to distinguish certain colors, not that everything is gray). I can't see a difference between the blue and the purple, but this doesn't cause a problem for me -- I just miss some of the highlighting, which is unavoidable. The bold terms jump out at me, but the coloration seems reasonable. All in all, the scheme seems reasonable to me. -- Knute Snortum