Hi Valentin;

  This is very nice, thank you. Lovely.

Ken

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 12:04 AM Valentin Petzel <valen...@petzel.at> wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> I’d argue than in this example the Caesura is placed in a weird way, so we
> need to tell Lilypond to actually do it this way. That can be achieved by
> something as simple as
>
> caesura =
>   \tweak text \markup\musicglyph "scripts.caesura.straight"
>   \tweak outside-staff-priority 100
>   \tweak space-alist
>   #'((ambitus extra-space . 0)                  ; we could do '()
> if we can live with warnings
>      (custos minimum-space . 0)
>      (key-signature minimum-space . 0)
>      (time-signature minimum-space . 0)
>      (staff-bar minimum-space . 0)
>      (clef minimum-space . 0)
>      (cue-clef minimum-space . 0)
>      (cue-end-clef minimum-space . 0)
>      (first-note fixed-space . 0)
>      (right-edge extra-space . 0))
>   \breathe
>
> {
>   r4 e8 g b[
>   \caesura
>   d' f' g']
> } \addlyrics {
>   just a step be -- yond the
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
> Am Sonntag, 1. Mai 2022, 18:19:26 CEST schrieb Kenneth Wolcott:
> > Hi Phil;
> >
> >   Lilypond 2.22.2 Notation Reference explicitly states that.
> >
> >   Thanks for your 2.23 documentation link as it does help, but by no
> > means looks like what I need (see attachment).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ken
> >
> > On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:
> > > AFAICS there is no requirement to use gregorian.ly to get a caesura.
> > > Why do you think there is?
> > >
> > > See
> > > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as->
> > >  > curves#breath-marks>
> > > On 01/05/2022 06:38, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> > > > Hi;
> > > >
> > > > I see that the use of \caesura requires \include "gregorian.ly",
> > > > according to the Notation Reference.
> > > >
> > > > But doing this completely screws up all the default display Lilypond
> > > > code that I've been using all along.
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to engrave "Somewhere Over the Rainbow", which definitely
> > > > does not belong in the Gregorian time period or style.
> > > >
> > > > Yet this piece of music does have two instances of a caesura.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a solution to this conundrum?  Can I safely cherry pick the
> > > > definition of the caesura out of the "gregorian.ly" file?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ken Wolcott
>

Reply via email to