I can see that it is a complex business constructing a new software package.
I was under the impression that, on 12 Aug 2022, I downloaded lilypong02.20.0 build 20200311175017-darwin-64.tar, unpacked it and ran the package on my 64-bit M2 MacBookAir running Ventura 13.4.1 It ran successfully (once I had satisfied it that GS was ‘safe’. I used it successfully for a year. Was there a version (or a build) of 2.20.0 that ran on 64 bit machines? Some say there was not; I think there was and that I used it. Beyond this last question I am done. I shall revert to using 2.18 on a old MacBook that still words; transferriing output to the 64-bit M2 machine for midi and for printing. Yours Ian West =================== > On 7 Oct 2023, at 09:27, Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote: > > >> On Oct 7, 2023, at 07:43, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> libpaper is listed on >>> https://ports.macports.org/port/ghostscript/details/ >>> >>> Well, that's too bad since there is no actual license >>> incompatibility due to the use as subprocess, as already noted by >>> several others. Not sure if MacPorts can be taught that. >> >> It would be a manual override by the MacPorts people to get pre-built >> LilyPond binaries. >> >> However, a better solution to the whole problem is actually quite >> simple, providing someone has some experience with MacPorts and a bit >> of spare time: Just provide a Pull Request for >> >> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/66653 >> >> to get an LGPLed 'libpaper' library. > > Dependent dynamic libraries, when binaries, are in MacPorts not bundled with > the programs that depend on them, but installed separately, and linked at > runtime. From a copyright point of view, this does not seem different from > calling another installed program. > > >
