I don't know, but what I meant to say is that this use of \tuplet outside of \voices or a split into multiple voices seems to me to be "undefined behavior" ("unspecified"?).

-William

On 10/16/23 19:09, David Kastrup wrote:
William Rehwinkel <will...@williamrehwinkel.net> writes:

Dear David,

This seems like an improper/unintended use of \tuplet.

How so?

How is

   \tuplet 3/2 \voices "",2 << { \voiceOne d''4 c'' es'' \oneVoice } \\
                              { g'4 as'2 } >>

improper while

   \tuplet 3/2  << { \voiceOne d''4 c'' es'' \oneVoice }
                    \new Voice { \voiceTwo g'4 as'2 } >>

isn't?  Either one does not create a new voice context for the upper
line, as the tie reaching into the upper voice (here omitted) proves.


--
William Rehwinkel - Oberlin College and Conservatory '24

will...@williamrehwinkel.net

PGP key: https://ftp.williamrehwinkel.net/pubkey.txt

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to