I'm into this!

1) Not sure on this one- you need to override the notehead in a \note {2}
markup somehow since there's not a dedicated glyph for that.
2) I think that's as close as you get with Emmantaler. You can see the list
of clefs here:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/notation/clef-style
3) \override Staff.TimeSignature.style = #'single-digit

Hope I don't annoy you by adding other things but:
1) there are two semibreve (quarter note in your edition) rests at the
beginning of the line if you haven't seen them
2) consider adding the custos engraver to your staff context like you did
with the ambitus: \consists "Custos_engraver" \override Custos.style =
#'mensural

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 5:24 PM Jeff Olson <jjoca...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is my first time using quasi-mensural notation for modern notation
> readers (going for medieval look, not historical accuracy).
>
> If you haven't gagged at that, I'd like some help on a few items.
>
> Here's how the original starts ... (IMSLP260656 p48)
> [image: InDulciJubilo1910]
>
> And this is my approximation so far (using more familiar note durations)
> ...
> [image: MWE-mensural.png]
>
> My MWE-mensural.ly so far ... (constrained to overrides in my Voice
> variable vs new MensuralStaff)
>
> \version "2.24.0"
> vexDUMa = \transpose c c' {
>   \tempo 2=100
>   \time 6/8
>   \override Staff.TimeSignature.style = #'mensural
>   \clef "petrucci-g"
>   \override NoteHead.style = #'petrucci
>   \override Staff.MetronomeMark.style = #'petrucci
>   \override Staff.AmbitusNoteHead.style = #'petrucci
>   \cadenzaOn
>   c4\(  c2 c4 e2 f4   g2 a4 g2\) \bar "," %1
>   g4\(  c2 c4 e2 f4   g2 a4 g2.\) \breathe \bar "," %2
>   \bar "||"
> }
> \score {
>   { \vexDUMa }
>   \layout { \context { \Staff \consists "Ambitus_engraver" }}
> }
>
> My questions ...
>
> 1)  How to get petrucci style note head in the tempo indication?
>
> 2)  Where to get the G clef as used in Piae Cantiones?
>
> 3)  How to get the time signature as used in Piae Cantiones?
>
> TIA,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to