Arguable one would not even need a different function. It would be enough for the existing functions to handle key-lists. Such as `(ly:grob-property grob '(bound-details left))`. This would then essentially reflect how property paths are handled by the parser.
Am Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2025, 06:49:25 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > >> I wonder whether we should have a Scheme function for that, making > >> it simpler to set an entry in `bound-details`. > > > > ly:grob-set-nested-property! > > ? > > Yes, that's it, thanks! > > > Werner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
