>> > The output looks strange to me. Shouldn't this be rather the
>> > following?
>
> If you want to come up with a coherent way to name it, that's fine.
This is my primary goal, yes.
> But that is more of an analysis question than a jazz theory question
> [...]
I probably confused readers with the formulation of my question. What
I want is to produce a good and consistent mapping from notes to chord
names. Whether the result makes sense for musicians is not relevant.
> [...] So, I would suggest for lilypond default, <c d e f g> would be
> "C add2 add4".
Thanks for confirmation.
Werner
