On Monday 22 August 2005 21.24, Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence wrote: > Alas that did not solve the problem in 2.7.4 but it did solve it for > 2.6.x so at least I've got a good copy now. > Thanks all. > Jay > BTW there does seem to be disagreement on the list, I am under the > impression that Han-Wen thinks 2.7x are usable and therefore should be > used (and sometimes have to be used to get benefit from some of the > needed features) > But then Mats/Graham and others keep on recommending staying with > 'stable' which won't have the 'needed' features. I'd love a > clarification on this one.
It depends on what you expect from it: 2.7 _is_ usable, so you can use it if you like. We also appreciate bug reports and comments. However, it's not stable, which means that - there's a greater risk of random errors - people like Mats and Graham (and me) are less likely to help you if you run into problems. So, it's up to you. If you need the new features, you can either use 2.7 and expect a lower degree of support, or you can wait for 2.8. Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
