Peter Mogensen wrote: > Thanks... I was wondering. Since there's many ways to do things in > Lilypond, there's also many ways to do them wrong. > Are there some kind of review process when I add to the repository?
Anyway... He're an example (I think there's no copyright problems with this one): http://bigendian.dk/lily/ Please tell me if you think it's good enough to upload. As I said, it's not perfect. When I look at the source, I can think of the following problem/hacks: * Ties are not continued into second endings * There's no support for flams, ruffs and rolls in Lilypond (slip=flam) * I had to make ghost gracenotes in the other instruments because of flams in the snare voice * It's difficult to get rehearsalmarks to not collide with volta and other text like "Fine" and metronome indications. * I was lucky with this piece that tremolo strokes were not needed on any beamed notes (to simulate ruffs and rolls). Beames would have caused them to align to the beam, producing wrong results. * When you create a \book, you can change the "piece" text for each piece, but you can't change the "instrument". So I used "piece" * The final partial meassure has a "r4", which doesn't show. The reason is that I had to use "R4" to get the staff hidden when empty. (look the last measure of the drumStaff) * When using a one-line staff, rehearsalmarks think they can move closer to the remaining line... and then they collide with the bars :( * Bar numbers collide with StaffGroup braces. * I had to do a wierd hack to the last full measure of the snare and explicitly write the beam. Else Lilypond would place to stroked 8ths instead... Don't know why. ... oh.. .and don't mind the MIDI-info. It's probably broken. Peter _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user