Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
This is a different machine (i386) with a new installation of Debian
sid that has not run Lily yet.
ldd -v `which lilypond` gives:
not a dynamic executable.
I'm looking for the output of the binary which will be in
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond
preferably with LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting done by /usr/local/bin/lilypond
Would LD_LIBRARY_PATH be set in a shell so that I don't know how to see
it? I was just looking at the variables in the xterm where I had just
run Lily.
ldd /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond gives:
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7fe1000)
libguile.so.16 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libguile.so.16 (0xb7f0d000)
libgmp.so.3 => /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libgmp.so.3
(0xb7edb000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0xb7eb6000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0xb7e7c000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xb7e40000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0xb7e3c000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xb7db3000)
libfontconfig.so.1 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xb7d84000)
libfreetype.so.6 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xb7d1d000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libz.so.1
(0xb7d0a000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7ce3000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7bac000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fe9000)
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7b7e000)
libltdl.so.3 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/../lib/libltdl.so.3 (0xb7b77000)
libexpat.so.0 =>
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/../lib/libexpat.so.0 (0xb7b57000)
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user