Hey, all!
Just wanted to take an informal survey...
How many 'Ponders put their dynamics directly in the "note code", e.g.,
notes = { a\pp b }
and why?
How many 'Ponders use a separate dynamics variable, e.g.,
notes = { a b }
dynamics = { \pp }
<< \notes \dynamics >>
and why?
How many 'Ponders use both systems, and what are the circumstances
that dictate the choice?
I've found using separate \dynamics to be more flexible, especially
when sections of notes repeat with different dynamics (so that you
can use \repeat on the notes but not the dynamics). However, I find
it much harder to manage the "split code".
In any case, I'm happy to be shown where I'm wrong, and learn "the
right way". =)
Finally, is there a way to use recent additions (e.g.,
\parallelMusic) and get the best of both worlds?
Thanks,
Kieren.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
