Hello.
>
> Thunderbird doesn't include a "Reply to list" command,
Then, you could file a bug ("wishlist") report, requesting
the feature.
> to lilypond list, and since all other lists follow the practice
> mentioned above, there's no reason for me to change my habits.
>
It depends. If the lilypond ML settings are the right way to do
it, then you should.
> But I like LilyPond much and I'd like to use it, so I'd like to monitor
> its mailing lists regularly, but the reply behavior of this list sucks.
>
"All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." (http://www.mutt.org/)
By default, "mutt" provides key bindings that do the right thing.
E.g. when viewing your post, I get the following behaviour:
Key -> Address
r (reply) -> To: Tomas Valusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
g (group reply) -> To: Tomas Valusek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
L (list reply) -> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Isn't that nice? :-)
[Note that the group reply does *not* include the ML as one of the
recipients!]
Best,
Gilles
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
