I've used it quite a bit as well, but that was a couple of years ago. More recently, Han-Wen has shown be how I could achieve most of what I needed using better integrated constructs.
M4 worked fine, quoting kind of killed me though... D. Quoting joe ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have used M4 as a preprocessor, and it worked quite well. Then I > found out the proper construct for what I wanted to do, so I dropped it > on that little project. But I wouldn't hesitate to use it again if I > got stuck like I was at that time. M4: http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/ > > Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >>LilyPond is powerful, and I'd like to see more of that power made > >>more easily accessible. I'm not asking for changes to the basic > >>syntax at all--anything I'd come up with would be a totally optional > >>pre-pass system. > >> > >> > > > >Try m4. > > > > > > Werner > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >lilypond-user mailing list > >lilypond-user@gnu.org > >http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > > > > > -- > Joe Ferguson > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
