> Karl Hammar wrote: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > >> > >>yes, but why on earth are people still using lilypond 2.6.x ? > >> > >> > >> > >For me: simply because 2.9.3 generated postscript files does not work > >with my printer (Minolta/Qms PagePro 9100). > > > > > Why not print the PDF file instead?
I don't see any reason for using or learning a new file format, since I have experience with and tools to work with postscript. Also, I have printed pdf formely, and they did not come out the way I wanted. So for me, pdf is less control. > Also, I hope you know that version 2.9 is a development > version, so for any serious typesetting I recommend the > stable version 2.8.x. If the question is 2.8 vs. 2.6 it's simply so that I get 2.6 with a simple apt-get install. Also, since I guess I am seeing the same problem with otf fonts as John Hawkinson (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2006-04/msg00315.html) I didn't test 2.8. > /Mats /Karl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
