> However, based in my own experience and many postings on > lilypond-user@gnu.org, I perceive a need for information that falls between > content of tutorial and reference documentation -- more detailed than the > tutorial material and less cryptic than the internals reference.
I completely agree. There are quite a few things that I've found missing in both of those places. > Please comment on the proposal. Would AllAbouts be useful to you? Would > you be willing to contribute? Who is now responsible for the Examples? Who > is willing and able to manage postings? It sounds like it would be very useful--at least to me. I would be willing to contribute on the subject of charts for pop/rock/jazz groups, since what's there doesn't really address how do this and get professional results. My 0.02USD. -- Shamus _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
