On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 11:37:34 +0200 (CEST) Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you haven't heard about convert-ly, look it up in the manual. > > BTW, I'm not happy about the name `convert-ly', for various reasons. > What about `ly-convert'? If we're changing the name, what about "ly-update" ? IMO "convert" is better used for changing from one filetype to another, whereas "update" is better used for one version of a file to another. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
