On Sun 06 August 2006 13:43, Johannes Schöpfer wrote:
> > the chords. The chord names should NOT be text markup with no musical
> > content, which would be the consequence of Johannes's suggestion.
>
> i don't want text markup chords.
Then perhaps I misunderstood what you meant. Sorry about that. But if your
wish that the 'input-syntax would be equal to the printed chordsymbols in the
output' were granted, it would call for a whole lot of different input styles
too, which I think is a bad idea. The input system should be based on a
consistent application of simple rules - more or less like it is today. And I
think the default output should too. Thus, I'm not sure about your example:
> c:6.9 would print "c6/9" and not "c6/add9", and i think that is what
> everybody expects from this input.
You're probably right about more people being more used to 6/9, but 6add9 is
unambiguous, whereas C6/9 COULD be read as C9add6 (=C13). 6/9 would be a
single exception from the rule, which in principle is a bad thing.
I also took your comment about what the midi output should or should not
reflect as a concession to the problems involved in this multi-mode input.
Thus: "output reflects input directly" + "midi not directly tied to input"
= "some kind of text markup". That's how I read you, anyway.
Eyolf
--
TYBALT What, art thou drawn among these heartless hinds?
Turn thee, Benvolio, look upon thy death.
BENVOLIO I do but keep the peace: put up thy sword,
Or manage it to part these men with me.
TYBALT What, drawn, and talk of peace! I hate the word,
As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee:
Have at thee, coward!
-- William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act I, Scene I
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
