Thanks Kieren, Yes, now I see it is happening on my left oriented string numbers, and arpeggios too. I think I'll wait for a more global fix from a developer, (even if I have to try to do one of those complicated "call back" fixes), rather than spend a week re-editing every measure and all future work. Maybe this post belongs on the bug list, pretty serious IMO.
Rick Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > Hi, Rick! > >> There is a problem with notes that both start a measure and have an >> accidental. >> [...] I can't be the first one to notice it). > > If you search the archives, you'll see that I've asked this question > a number of times. > And it's also true of other "left-side attachements", e.g., arpeggios. > > I've yet to receive a satisfactory response/solution/explanation. =\ > > What I've been doing in the meantime is manually tweaking the X- > extent of the Accidental (or BarLine) to force the padding, e.g. > > \once \override Accidental #'X-extent = #'(-2 . 1) bs > > It's definitely a time-consuming process, but I haven't found a > better solution -- if you find one, I'd greatly appreciate hearing > about it! =) > > Best, > Kieren. > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Minimum-padding-after-barlines-for-notes-with-accidentals--tf2265851.html#a6287966 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user