Yes, I am myself a "2-2-2-2-maniac" too. :)
By the way, I wonder if this beaming tradition has once had any justification. Whatever, Music notation is still (and must keep) evolving, isnt'it ? Thank you for opening this discussion. 2006/11/20, Martial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That may be a good reason to do so. Nevertheless I think that the > alternative way of beaming should be easier to obtain than via a > number of scheme statements. > But apparently I stand alone in this. No, you're not alone! I use group 2 per 2 for choir score too, to read it's more easy, especially for the amateurs singers. So I put in the head of my score file this "macro" qbeam. -- Martial _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
