Erik Sandberg <mandolaerik <at> gmail.com> writes: > The fact that they chose to switch to computer-engraving doesn't contradict > that hand-engraving is far better; [...]
True. On the other hand, hand-engraved doesn't always mean better. I've seen, sung from and copied hand-engraved scores (or photocopies thereof) that were quite unreadable. A good hand-engraved score (as well as a recent LilyPond-engraved score) is quite beautiful and can withstand photocopying very well. On another note, I'm looking for the paper quality, printing technique and printer that will best do LilyPond justice. Office laserprinter on 80g A4 white office paper is all quite well, but I'm thinking along the lines of 120g or heavier, off-white or even recycled paper, and of course I dream of etching a LilyPond score into a plate and printing it in some kind of gravure printer ;-) -- Arvid _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user