On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:57, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Werner LEMBERG escreveu: > >> I suppose you could add the command \times 3:2 {a b c} to do exactly > >> the same as \times 2/3 {a b c} [...] > > > > If at all, then > > > > \tuplet 3:2 {...} > > I don't mind changing \times to \tuplet, and agree that the confusion with > \time is a bad thing. We could make \tuplet accept 3:2 2/3 and 3. > > Since it is a change that can be accomodated with convert-ly, we wouldn't > even need a major version bump for it.
I think these changes sound scary, it is an additional hack in the parser machinery. I think it would be cleaner if \times could be changed to a proper music function, e.g. as \tuplet 2 3 {...} This would remove rules from the parser instead of adding them. (Hm, my suggestion is not really in line with this discussion; I can agree that \tuplet 2 3 would be easier to confuse with "3:2" than \tuplet 2/3 is). -- Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user