On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > ... hmm, what about allowing
> > \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e} \tuplet { f e d}
>
> Again, I definitely vote against! We already now have too many
> optional constructs in the syntax, which causes more confusion than
> it helps.I also vote against this. AFAIK, this kind of repetition seldom happens for other cases than 2/3 and 4/6; we can easily build music functions for those cases (i.e., create a unary function \triplet etc.) -- Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
