Yes, that makes sense.
Frédéric
2006/12/21, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Frédéric Chiasson wrote:
> But to avoid repeating \tuplet functions for long passages with the
> same tuplets, we could admit that kind of syntax :
>
> \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e f g a b c d e d c b a g f e d}
>
> without having one long bracket going through all the notes. But I
> understand that you don't want to change that for programming issues.
It is not possible to determine whether "long" tuplets should be
splitted or not; how then would you determine whether
\tuplet 3:2 {c4 c8 c c4}
should be printed as
|----- 3 ----|
__
| | | |
| | | |
X X X X
or as
|- 3 -| |- 3 -|
| |\ |\ |
| | | |
X X X X
?
In your example,
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
can already save from typing \tuplet (\times today) a lot of times.
Cheers,
--
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
