> > Only a native speaker can say that :-) Honestly, it's very easy to > > intermix them during fast typing. I don't say that the difference > > between those two words is problematic, just that it unnecessarily > > increases the probability of a typo. > > I respectfully disagree. I've never mistyped either word in a > LilyPond file.
Congratulations! I do it regularly. > should be asking for the elimination of the "\" symbol? And how > many times have I seen the query ". . . Score.RehersalMark > . . . doesn't work." Should we change that to "R-mark" to avoid > typos? This is harmless compared to `acciaccatura' :-) > Apostrophes ("'") are a problem too: it's hard to see them when > you're looking for errors; let's replace them with something clear > like "*". It seems that you should write your scores with MusicXML... This greatly increases verbosity... To be serious: Do you see a necessity for a basic LilyPond command to be an abbreviation of another? Just think of editors which are able to complete a command with the tab key as soon as you type the first few letters (Emacs, for example). In case of \time vs. \times, you always have to add a final `s' or select between two choices. It would be interesting to do a survey whether there are other commands belonging into this category. I favour to rename them all to disambiguate. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user