> 2. In lilypond version 2.8 and earlier it was possible to notate as I'm > wanting, so the newest lilypond version is a regress compared with > earlier versions, and I'm insisting, that this is a bug.
I don't think that lily 2.8 was supposed to do this; it was a fortunate bug. Why should *being able* to do something that ones wants to do (as long as it isn't harmful in some way) be considered a bug? I don't, I must admit, remember exactly what he was trying to do. Tim Reeves
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
