How does the musician know which of the voices the ottava bracket
should apply to? In the current implementation, it
seems that the ottaviation is handled internally exactly the same way
as a clef change, which explains why it is handled
at the stave level. However, if there is an established notation
practice for separate octaviation on each voice, this could be
the topic of a feature request. You could of course work around
this easily, by using \transpose c c' {...} around the octaviated
section in the corresponding voice and adding the text and brackets
separately using text spanners.
There is no difference between 2.8 and 2.10 in this respect, as far as I know.
/Mats
Quoting David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I found (#set-octavation 1) to be useless in 2.8.7 because it's at staff
level instead of voice level. Why? In polyphony it nearly always has
to be at voice level, and if there is only one voice on the stave
it doesn't matter. Is it better in 2.10?
Example: http://www.openguitar.com/pdf/campanil.pdf
daveA
--
Free download of technical exercises worth a lifetime of practice:
http://www.openguitar.com/dynamic.html :::: You can play the cards
you're dealt, or improve your hand with DGT. Very easy guitar
solos, duets, exercises. http://www.openguitar.com/contact.html
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
